How many five-year-olds could you take in a fight?

Finally, someone uses those ridiculous personality archetype quizzes for something productive.

Oh, and I got "28".

I'd really like to know Intensity's score. ;)

And due to crazy traffic, the page is now down.

Sure, spun, tell us all about it, then send your raging fans to shut it down so we can't see it.  I see what your evil plan is.

Well, apparently, there is widespread interest in the question, because the site won't load that page.

But, I see potential for a great "versus" thread in the Hero Files forum. Now, let's see... If I wear a "cup", does that count as two points of invulnerabilty?  :P

I think that would have to depend very highly on the 5th graders.  Are we talking 5th graders from Detroit or Beverly Hills?  It's all in the attitude.  I know which I would rather take on . . .

Quote from: Uncle Yuan on December 14, 2007, 08:21:51 AM
I think that would have to depend very highly on the 5th graders.  Are we talking 5th graders from Detroit or Beverly Hills?  It's all in the attitude.  I know which I would rather take on . . .

Not 5th graders. 5 year olds. I have trouble taking more than two 5th graders in a fight!

it seems that the site is weak and has no bandwidth.

Thanks Spud given that i get questions a lot about fighting, this was an important part of my self realization.  I scored 36, which Im sure is due to my martial training and fight experience.  I was probably held back slightly by the moral issue.

sorry i couldnt figure out how to post the little image it generates.  I know how to fight but not post spiffy things in the forums or my signature.

I got 31, but i'm sure the mosh pit practice would help a fair bit ^_^

i got 26. 

Quote from: UnfluffyBunny on December 14, 2007, 03:18:05 PM
I got 31, but i'm sure the mosh pit practice would help a fair bit ^_^

I counted mosh pit practice as 'being trampled'. Sure, I havent gone under peoples feet but I have rammed into colums of people and gotten kicked with a steel toe boot in the pitt. Still ended up with 28 due to my moral convictions.

So how many could batman take down before he is beaten sensless?

Has anyone gotten higher than 39? I put in everything to indicate maximum physical aptitude, combat experience, and amoral utilitarianism in battle. That resulted in a 39. (My actual score was much lower, despite being tall, strong, having some martial arts experience, and answering the morality questions under the mature "but they started it" assumption.  :P)

23. Unfortunately, I'm a skinny bastard. :(

21!? 

GAH!

If I had a decent pair of boots on I could trample twice that number while hardly breaking stride I just KNOW it.


Stoopid questionnaire...


My problem is that I'm just too damn nice!

Too nice by half, me.

Only 15? :(

I got 33 because I have no compunction about using another 5 year old as a weapon. :thumbup:

31

-MJB

30
More if I could get to a car....

28.
More if I could get to a brick wall...

I'm to nice for my own good. I only got 25 because I would feel bad about beating up kids. But oddly enough, I don't mind using one as a weapon if I have too.

You could take on 30 five year old kids in a fight.

LMAO! I really want to throw a five year old at a group of other five year olds, now..

*sheepishly* 11. :oops:

ow_tiobe_sb
Phantom Bunburyist and A Lover, Not a Fighter

I got 15.

If I can take 15 5-year-olds, does that mean I can take 1 75-year-old?

24... man, I need to work out.

FORIAMSPAM!

23...beaten by Spam? Oh the humanity...

OMG, 20 only, i'm dissappointed.

Sadly I think it's the truth

You could take on 33 Five Year Olds

:huh:

But...not even in self defense?

You could take on 20 five year old kids in a fight :blink:

Ah come on!

Sigh . . . 20

Well, I suppose it would be a bad sign if a physician scored high on this test.  Unless maybe they were a orthopedic surgeon . . . they use power tools in the OR and they're all (former) jocks.

I got 28.

I was actually just wondering this very thing a few weeks ago.

You could take on 39 five year old kids in a fight.

Wow...and here I was worried about taking on 39 fifty year olds.....

This test says 23, but all evidence points to 3.