The Greatest Philosophical Question of Our Time

[Conduit]

This quiz is amazing.  Great find.

I got 15.

[Alaric]

I... have some troubling news. Like, I'm sure, the rest of you, I had been assuming that this test was the product of the latest, most accurate scientific reasearch. With that in mind, I wondered how an exceptionally-wimpy 5-year-old would do on the test, and I re-ran the test giving answers as if I were, in fact, the afore-mentioned exceptionally-wimpy 5-year-old. Imagine my shock when I found that, according to the test, an exceptionally-wimpy 5-year-old can, in fact, take 4 normal 5-year-olds in a fight! Clearly, the test is, in some way, flawed.

I realize that this is intensely desturbing news. It seems we may need to seek our answers elsewhere- or, perhaps, aknowledge that some questions are essentially unanswerable.

[Epimethee]

Well, Alaric, the test seems perfectly valid to me: If the defending kid is both wimpy and reading this scientific test (not bad for a zero-grader), then, quite logically, he must be an uber-nerd. As such, it's only reasonable to assume that he can use his hyper-big (latent mutant?) brain to K.O. bigger kids by headbashing them.

For the record, I got 17... Mind you, my score would probably be much higher if I were myself the parent of a five year old – I probably wouldn't have any compunction against playing dirty and using *$#@! brats as projectiles. ;)

[Mowgli]

As an elementary school teacher, I have often pondered this question...

29.

It's a relief to know that number is higher than the head count in any of my kindergarten or first grade classes.

[doctorchallenger]

15

Have to get that moral compass adjusted (and work out).

[The Pwime]

20.

Gee, i'm actually impressed with myself...

[catastrophe]

You could take on 33 five year old kids in a fight.

im happy to know ill be able to defend myself to such a common danger

[Sgt. Friday]

30 5 year olds.  :thumbup:

And like Figure Fan, I to have a sudden compulsion to chuck one of the little brats at a horde of the little buggers!  :twisted:

"What? Why are you looking at me like that?"

[GogglesPizanno]

24.
My physical limitations were overcome by a big gaping whole where my morality should be...

[Mr. Cow]

i could only take 23 five year olds.. but if i got DYAM and BWPS with me we'd take down every 5 year old on the planet! (and that includes spud with them) :thumbup:

[murs47]

I got 24, but in reality it would be zero. The idea of a group of merciless and violent 5 year olds would have me laughing until they knocked me unconscious.

[Intensity]

I got 30... but only because my morality scores held me back.  First and foremost, before being a martial artist... I am a teacher.  Unless the kids had turned into zombies, or if they were also killing/beating up other people, I wouldn't necessarily fight them with my best.  This survey made me sad, because my martial arts school is closed this week and I miss teaching my kids.  :(

lol.

[thalaw2]

I got 23 too....I feel horrible. 

What a night on the town it would make if I was dating X-23 (according to the dating test) and we got mobbed by five year olds.....do you think she would be impressed? 

[Mr. Hamrick]

I got 23 too....I feel horrible. 

What a night on the town it would make if I was dating X-23 (according to the dating test) and we got mobbed by five year olds.....do you think she would be impressed? 

nah, she'd probably leave you for me.

[Bujin]

I got 31, but then I'm elderly - in my prime I could proudly take on entire battalions of ankle-biters.  ;)