Freedom Reborn

Community Forums => Film, Television, Video and Music Discussion => Topic started by: Glitch Girl on June 10, 2009, 03:19:49 PM

Title: Futurama 2.0
Post by: Glitch Girl on June 10, 2009, 03:19:49 PM
It's baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaack.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/reviews/8092758.stm
Title: Re: Futurama 2.0
Post by: The Hitman on June 10, 2009, 05:26:55 PM
This better not be any of that "chopping up the 'movies' to form episodes" malarky.
Title: Re: Futurama 2.0
Post by: BWPS on June 10, 2009, 05:35:03 PM
WOO! And I'm alive and saying WOO! that isn't air escaping from my fat rolls.

This is the best news ever. Unfortunately the movies haven't been too amazing, but a lot of that has to do with the length. 22 minutes is a good size!
Title: Re: Futurama 2.0
Post by: ubergreendragon on June 10, 2009, 06:58:09 PM
Good news everyone.. :thumbup:
Title: Re: Futurama 2.0
Post by: Silver Shocker on June 10, 2009, 11:18:03 PM
"Hurray, things were bad, but now they're good again. FOREVER!"

Sounds like good news. I hope it is good though and doesn't go downhill (Family Guy has gotten bad IMO)
Title: Re: Futurama 2.0
Post by: The Troll on June 11, 2009, 02:52:08 AM
Futurama is the greatest show ever made. If they keep the cast and the writers, they could keep going forever...especially if they hold true to the last movie and have the main characters appear in another universe...they could start from scratch.
Title: Re: Futurama 2.0
Post by: BentonGrey on June 11, 2009, 03:15:38 AM
Ehh, I've been more and more disappointed with the movies, so I'm not sure how I feel about this.  I really loved the show itself...so we'll see.
Title: Re: Futurama 2.0
Post by: Gremlin on June 11, 2009, 03:55:48 AM
Quote from: ubergreendragon on June 10, 2009, 06:58:09 PM
Good news everyone.. :thumbup:

"You're now reading these posts in my voice!"
Title: Re: Futurama 2.0
Post by: Camma on June 11, 2009, 04:07:22 PM
This is good news everybody!

I have to agree with the sentiment that Futurama is one of the greatest shows.  Between Comedy Central reruns and the DVDs I think Ive watched Futurama more than the Simpsons now even though i have the Simpsons on DVD as well (and thats a lot of episodes to compete with).
Title: Re: Futurama 2.0
Post by: Talavar on July 17, 2009, 09:43:41 PM
So apparently word around the internets is that Billy West, Katey Sagal, John DiMaggio and a couple of others are being replaced on the new episodes - which means Fry, Leela, Bender, Zoidberg, the Professor, Zap Brannigan, Kif, and a number of other characters, are all going to sound wrong in all these episodes.  I doubt a lot of the behind the scenes talent are going to be the same either, so I've got to think, what's the point of even making these?

Damn.
Title: Re: Futurama 2.0
Post by: stumpy on July 17, 2009, 10:00:55 PM
Yeah, I spotted this note on the new casting (http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/news/e3ibdf529f18374f6c965f140dbc42e7419) when looking for some news on the new production. That's too bad. Ultimately, it's the writing that makes the series, but the voice acting was really brilliant and would be hard to equal. The article made it sound like the door wasn't completely closed on the original cast, but it looks bleak.
Title: Re: Futurama 2.0
Post by: BWPS on July 18, 2009, 12:01:36 AM
At this point he should just try to make a new show. I'd be very interesting in a new Matt Groening show with new (obviously) voice actors. The man did create the funniest show of all time and then made a show even funnier than that. But Futurama without any of the main characters' proper voices just isn't going to be Futurama and it will be too difficult to accept. Let's hope they work something out.
Title: Re: Futurama 2.0
Post by: deano_ue on July 18, 2009, 08:08:54 PM
the cast is what made the writing work so well, sadly without the cast this series will have major problems
Title: Re: Futurama 2.0
Post by: Talavar on July 18, 2009, 10:33:58 PM
I personally don't have a lot of faith in Matt Groening himself; the Simpsons didn't get good until other people were more involved in the show's production like Brad Bird & Conan O'Brien, among others, and Futurama rests more on David X. Cohen than Matt Groening, in my opinion.
Title: Re: Futurama 2.0
Post by: Podmark on July 19, 2009, 08:33:39 PM
Futurama without the original main cast simply won't work. The whole feel of the series will be gone.

I'm hoping this is just some negotiating ploy.
Title: Re: Futurama 2.0
Post by: deano_ue on July 21, 2009, 10:50:14 PM
"1:00-1:45 Futurama: Life or Death?!? Be a part of sci-fi history! Join executive producers Matt Groening and David X. Cohen, and stars Billy West, Katey Sagal, John DiMaggio, and Maurice LaMarche for high-stakes thrills as a top-ranking FOX executive decides live, on stage, whether Futurama will make yet another triumphant return or whether it is gone forever! The very fate of Futurama hangs in the balance! Paramedics will be standing by in case the intense excitement causes any panelists to collapse. Raucous celebration or abject despair to follow the news. Ballroom 20 "

with the news of the con i smell a fix, but honestly if this is a pressure thing it could backfire badly
Title: Re: Futurama 2.0
Post by: Talavar on July 31, 2009, 10:48:51 PM
Bit of a weird source, but word is that the original voice cast are re-signed.  I hope this is true.

http://www.thestar.com/comment/columnists/article/674841 (http://www.thestar.com/comment/columnists/article/674841)
Title: Re: Futurama 2.0
Post by: BWPS on August 01, 2009, 12:03:05 AM
Quote from: Talavar on July 31, 2009, 10:48:51 PM
Bit of a weird source, but word is that the original voice cast are re-signed.  I hope this is true.

http://www.thestar.com/comment/columnists/article/674841 (http://www.thestar.com/comment/columnists/article/674841)


Well they seem pretty sure. God I hope its true.
Title: Re: Futurama 2.0
Post by: marhawkman on August 01, 2009, 01:41:27 AM
It sounds very plausible.
Title: Re: Futurama 2.0
Post by: BWPS on August 01, 2009, 05:01:45 AM
Several other places say so! (http://news.google.com/news/story?q=futurama+cast+news&sourceid=navclient-ff&rlz=1B3DVFA_enUS246US264&um=1&ie=UTF-8&ncl=dThlpIQ2MOwIRtM&hl=en&ei=28tzStG7C9WOtgePp92WCQ&sa=X&oi=news_result&ct=more-results&resnum=4)

This is just the greatest news ever.
Title: Re: Futurama 2.0
Post by: marhawkman on August 01, 2009, 05:04:17 AM
I just hope it'll be as good as those dvd movies were.
Title: Re: Futurama 2.0
Post by: MJB on August 01, 2009, 07:04:52 AM
I'm just waiting for this news to be truly official...
Title: Re: Futurama 2.0
Post by: Silver Shocker on August 02, 2009, 01:56:08 AM
This looks like a good sign:

http://tv.ign.com/articles/100/1009858p1.html (http://tv.ign.com/articles/100/1009858p1.html)

Quote20th informed us that voice actor Maurice LaMarche ("Kif Kroker"/Additional Voices) posted that he would be returning on his Facebook page, and that deals with the rest of the cast are imminent and will hopefully be finalized by the end of the day.

Update 2: And now we're completely in the clear! We just got this word from 20th Century Fox: "Just wanted you to know that we now have deals with the entire Futurama voice cast to return: John DiMaggio, Maurice LaMarche, Billy West, Tress MacNeille and Katey Sagal."

Futurama creators Matt Groening and David X. Cohen released this statement: "We are thrilled to have our incredible cast back. The call has already gone out to the animators to put the mouths back on the characters."
Title: Futurama 2.0 Premier!
Post by: Previsionary on June 24, 2010, 11:29:53 PM
Good news, everyone! Hour long premier of Futurama TONIGHT on Comedy Central. Who's gonna watch?
Title: Re: Futurama 2.0
Post by: BentonGrey on June 25, 2010, 03:48:51 AM
Well....I felt like it was pretty mediocre.  I'll probably watch a few more episodes to see if it improves.  The second episode was a good bit better than the first, though the ending left a bad taste in my mouth.....ewwww.......
Title: Re: Futurama 2.0
Post by: stumpy on June 26, 2010, 04:31:11 PM
I enjoyed the episodes, but not at much as the pre-cancellation ones. I almost get the impression they are trying too hard in an effort to have things happen that seem creative and weird. Kind of a "but wait - it gets more bizarre!" attitude. Obviously, a science fiction show is going to have a its share of wacky occurrences, but it seems to me that the best episodes have been the ones that center on some aspect of a character's background or personality. When the writers combine that with a humorous take on some pseudo science - maybe along with a futuristic twist on some classic TV or movie plot - and it seems they can come up with a winner. Really, I think that's why 602 was a little better than 601, though it also suffered from a "let's see how far we can take the risque implications" theme. (Not that I mind that content, but the idea of an out-of-control robot censoring satellite that forces the characters get busy mostly just left me wondering, "Now how did that make sense?")

Of course, it's still early and it's perhaps a bit unfair to compare the first few shows with my favorites of the previous several seasons. I'll still be tuning in to see what they have coming up. The Studio 122133 sign gag was enough to get me back at least a couple more times.  :P
Title: Re: Futurama 2.0
Post by: bredon7777 on June 29, 2010, 04:05:27 AM
"The Studio 122133 sign gag was enough to get me back at least a couple more times."


Yeah, not sure I get this. Care to explain?

Also, this - http://www.flickr.com/photos/pepa_quin/collections/72157624217868063/

This is awesome.  Words fail me- go look.
Title: Re: Futurama 2.0
Post by: marhawkman on June 29, 2010, 01:33:39 PM
1^2=1
2^1=2
3^3=9

it's a math joke....
Title: Re: Futurama 2.0
Post by: bredon7777 on June 29, 2010, 01:57:20 PM
Quote from: marhawkman on June 29, 2010, 01:33:39 PM
1^2=1
2^1=2
3^3=9

it's a math joke....

Oh, now I get it. I made the same math error at first= 3^3=27, not 9. 27*2*1=Studio 54.

Title: Re: Futurama 2.0
Post by: BentonGrey on June 29, 2010, 03:32:18 PM
Math jokes....no such thing. :P
Title: Re: Futurama 2.0
Post by: BWPS on June 29, 2010, 04:16:02 PM
I remember the best quantum physics joke of all time which was also the best Futurama joke of all time.
Horse race announcer: It's a quantum finish! And the winner is- Harry Trotter!
Professor Farnsworth: No fair! You changed the outcome by measuring it!
Title: Re: Futurama 2.0
Post by: marhawkman on June 30, 2010, 03:00:08 PM
Quote from: bredon7777 on June 29, 2010, 01:57:20 PM
Quote from: marhawkman on June 29, 2010, 01:33:39 PM1^2=1
2^1=2
3^3=9

it's a math joke....
Oh, now I get it. I made the same math error at first= 3^3=27, not 9. 27*2*1=Studio 54.
Oh yeah, oops.  Kinda like the casino dicw in that one ep that had math formulas written on them?
Title: Re: Futurama 2.0
Post by: Sevenforce on July 05, 2010, 01:22:08 AM
Quote from: BentonGrey on June 29, 2010, 03:32:18 PM
Math jokes....no such thing. :P

Why is 10 afraid of 7? Cos 7 8 9!

Yuck yuck yuck...I kill me :D

Looking forward to seeing this when it gets to the UK ^^